
Informed by hundreds of stack assessments and 1,000+ implementations, Wolverine delivers clear, defensible insight into cyber coverage, risk, and cost. A true digital twin of your stack, built on an ontology-driven foundation that sits on top of the tools you already run. No rip and replace.
The Problem
Mission networks generate more security telemetry than any team can interpret, while adversaries automate and pivot at machine speed. Point tools each carry their own data model, leaving operators to stitch together partial pictures, and leaders unable to translate technical metrics into mission risk.
Defense in depth was never meant to be buying every layer twice. It means knowing exactly how your layers interlock, and where they leave you exposed.
Dozens of point tools, overlapping licenses, and seams between platforms that no single person fully owns.
Every tool speaks its own language. You cannot see overlap, coverage, or cost in one place.
NSM-8, Zero Trust, EDR, and logging requirements now apply to your systems, and spend has to map to them.
The Usual Pitch
The Cyberhill Approach
Another point tool, layered on top
A governed foundation under what you own
Adds to the sprawl you already have
Makes sense of the tools you already run
Its own data model, its own silo
One shared model across every tool
Demoed well, but can you trust it inside your boundary?
Traceable, explainable, and owned by you
Capabilities
Identify overlapping tools and features and quantify redundancy across the stack.
Benchmark real controls against MITRE ATT&CK, NIST 800-53, and RMF, not vendor claims.
Reveal weaknesses across data, network, and identity domains.
Show shortages and inefficiencies across people, processes, and technology.
See spend per tool, per feature, and per user, tied to the coverage it buys.
Stand up the mission's intelligence layer on top of existing cyber investments.
Wolverine is a living, queryable model of your entire security stack, built on Cerebro's knowledge graph. See everything at once and model the impact of adding, cutting, or swapping a tool against your real environment before you commit. Every finding is grounded in the graph and defensible, not a black-box score.
One view of every tool, feature, dependency, and dollar across the stack.
What-if scenario mapping: model the impact of a change before you make it.
Every finding traces to the graph. Defensible to leadership and auditors.
Ask Your Stack
No dashboards to learn. No reports to build. Ask Wolverine anything about your security posture.
Scenario
CISO
How compliant are we with NIST CSF and 800-53 controls?
You're at 73% coverage across NIST CSF. Strong in Detect (91%) and Protect (85%), but Recover is at 34%. Only 2 of 6 required recovery capabilities are covered.
Which Recover gaps are the most critical?
Incident Recovery Planning (RC.RP) and Communications (RC.CO) are both below threshold. You have no documented recovery playbook that maps to your current tooling, and your backup orchestration tool expired its license 4 months ago.
What would it take to close those gaps?
Renewing the backup orchestration license closes RC.RP partially. For full coverage, you need a tested recovery runbook tied to your actual tool dependencies. Estimated effort: 3 weeks with existing staff, zero new procurement.
Continuous Loop
Security and cost data from across the cyber stack.
Normalized into a shared ontology of tools, features, domains, and controls.
Posture, utilization, risk, compliance, and coverage evaluated with ontology-driven AI.
Recommendations to cut redundancy, close gaps, sustain compliance, and strengthen defense.
Continuously. The loop never stops.
Approval gates, change windows, kill switches, and audited actions.
Ties cyber risk to the systems that matter most.
Supports ongoing authorization (cATO) objectives.
Deployable into secure and classified environments.
A 30-minute Wolverine mission demo, on your stack's terms.
Prefer to talk? Schedule a 30-minute session with our public sector team.
Book NowChris Walker, VP of Federal Markets
Caitlyn McClellan, SVP of Federal Sales
No. It's a layer that sits on top of the tools you already own and makes sense of them. It doesn't add to the sprawl, it maps it, so you can see overlap, coverage, and cost in one place.
No rip and replace. Wolverine is ontology-driven and vendor-neutral, so it reads your current stack as-is and builds a shared model across every tool without touching what's deployed.
Wolverine builds a living, queryable model of your entire security environment, every tool, feature, dependency, and dollar. You can model the impact of adding, cutting, or swapping a tool against your real environment before you commit to the change.
It benchmarks real controls against MITRE ATT&CK, NIST 800-53, and RMF, and ties spend to the coverage it buys. That lets you show how your stack maps to NSM-8, Zero Trust, EDR, and logging requirements, not just claim it.
Every finding traces back to the knowledge graph, so it's explainable and defensible to leadership and auditors rather than a black-box score. Wolverine is human-in-the-loop by design, with approval gates, change windows, kill switches, and audited actions.
Yes. Wolverine applies across public sector, federal, defense, and state and local, wherever a security team is managing tool sprawl against compliance mandates. The mandates differ by level of government; the underlying clarity problem is the same.
Into secure and classified environments, on the infrastructure you already run. It supports continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization (cATO) objectives.
Book a 30-minute mission demo. We'll show it running against a stack like yours.